Nuclear Power Plants around the globe are being closed at a furious rate particularly in Europe.The Fukushima Disaster has caused a nuclear winter in the nuclear power plant industry.Even Nuclear Power Plant Equipment Leaders like Toshiba are changing their strategy to concentrate on Renewable Energy.Even new Nuclear Power Plants being built in India and China are facing massive opposition.New Nuclear Power Plants being built at Jaitapur and Tamil Nadu have met massive organized protests by local citizens throwing the future of nuclear power plants in jeopardy.The Communist Government in China too is going slow on the biggest rollout of nuclear power plants in the world.High Cost Escalation and long project delays had already made building new Nuclear Power Plants in the Developed World almost impossible.Japan and Germany which are two of the largest nuclear countries have decided to shut down all nuclear power plants.Switzerland and Belgium too have decided to kill the nuclear power industry in their countries.In this light it becomes very important to examine the pros and cons of nuclear power plants.A cost benefit analysis of nuclear energy is crucial as new plants cost billions of dollars and can cause massive costs if things go wrong as was the case with Chernobyl and Three Mile Island Disasters in the 1980s.

In the aftermath of the Nuclear Accident,Germany had temporarily shut 7 of its nuclear reactors none of which is going to be reopened.The other nuclear reactors will also will be completely mothballed by 2022 when their normal life ends.This is a huge death blow to nuclear energy as Germany had one of the largest installed capacities of nuclear power.Switzerland and Japan have killed nuclear energy as well after the catastrophic loss from nuclear power which led to radioactive rain in Seoul,deathly radiation in parts of Japan and the evacuation of 20 kms area from the site of the nuclear plant of TEPCO.

Nuclear Power Plants Pros

  1. Low Fuel Cost and High Energy Density - Nuclear Power Plants  requires very little fuel mostly in the form of uranium.Nuclear Power has the highest energy density compared to other forms of energy.Nuclear Energy Efficiency is thousands of times more effective than oil,gas or coal energy.This is a huge advantage over other fossil fuels whose costs are increasing at a drastic  rate every year.
  2. No Greenhouse Gas Emissions/Air Pollution – Nuclear Power Plants do not produce any GHG emissions or cause air pollution from the combustion of fossil fuels unlike coal,oil or gas.This makes them very attractive as a source of cheap,non carbon dioxide producing electricity
  3. High Load Factor - The Load Factor for Solar and Wind Energy ranges from 15-40% which is quite low compared to Nuclear Power Plants.Nuclear Power on the other hand  has a load factor of almost 85-90% which is the highest in the energy industry.
  4. Huge  Potential –Nuclear Power Potential is almost infinite compared to the limited and peak features of other forms of  energy like Wind,Geothermal,Oil,Gas and others.Only Solar Energy can be said to have more potential.Note new technologies and fuels like fast breeder and thorium are still in the works which can increase the potential of Nuclear Power more
  5. Nuclear Power provides 15% of the world’s Electricity Requirements – Nuclear Energy accounts for around 15% of the world’s production of electricity and for some countries like France there is no alternative in the short term with 80% of the electricity coming from nuclear reactors

Nuclear Power Plants Cons

  1. Nuclear and Radiation Accidents - This is the biggest con for Nuclear Energy and has been repeated 3 times in the last 30 years in Japan,Russia and USA.The fear of a repeat is so great that despite all the safety arrangements touted by the nuclear equipment operators and suppliers,Nuclear Energy faces an uncertain future
  2. Nuclear Waste Disposal – Again a massive problem as the spent Nuclear Rods of Nuclear Reactors are prohibitively costly and difficult to dispose of.Spent nuclear fuel is initially very highly radioactive and so must be handled with great care and forethought.There is no foolproof way to dispose nuclear waste fuel after it is used in the Nuclear Reactors.The area around Nuclear Waste Sites can be dangerous to humans for hundreds of year as complex nuclear elements have half lives running into many years.the United States had accumulated more than 50,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors.Permanent storage underground in U.S. had been proposed at the Yucca but that project has now been effectively cancelled.Presently, waste is mainly stored at individual reactor sites and there are over 430 locations around the world where radioactive material continues to accumulate.
  3. Low level of Radioactivity from Normal Operations - The nuclear power plants also produces a large volume of low-level radioactive waste in the form of contaminated items like clothing, hand tools, water purifier resins, and (upon decommissioning) the materials of which the reactor itself is built
  4. Nuclear proliferation – Many countries have used the ruse of nuclear energy programs to generate fuel for developing nuclear weapons.Currently there is a major international controversy with regards to the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program.Nuclear Reactors are targets for rogue state actors who can steal the fuel for creating radiation weapons
  5. High Capital Investment,Cost Overruns and Long Gestation Time - The time to construct a large Nuclear power project can take between 5-10 years which leads to time and cost overruns.The Nuclear Plant being built in Finland has been one of the biggest failures in Project Finance.The reactor has been delayed by many year and has led to a massive cost overrun.Areva the main nuclear equipment supplier has endured huge losses.In fact the safety regulations and the long time of construction has brought the Nuclear Energy in the Developed World to almost a halt.
  6. Regulations – The Regulations for Nuclear Power Plants are many and cumbersome due to the massive risks of a failure of a nuclear reactor.This greatly increases the costs of generating nuclear power.It also leads to a long time in the actual start to the completion of a Nuclear Plant .
  7. Fuel Danger - Uranium which is the main fuel used in Nuclear Fission Power Plants is limited to a few countries and suppliers.Its use and transport is regulated by international treaties and groups.India which came under sanctions because of testing of nuclear weapons had to shut many of its nuclear plants because of embargoes.

Green Banking in India has started increasing at a rapid pace as concerns over Global Warming increase.Most of India’s Banks are pushing for Clean Technology in their separate ways.Though there is lack of regulation on funding of environment friendly projects,Banks are pushing ahead on their own anyway.India’s Financial Sector has seen the writing on the wall as the largest bank SBI is using Wind Energy for captive consumption to reduce its carbon footprint.The Bank is also reducing the interest rates for Green Projects beside helping in carbon consulting of customers.SBI is also implementing thousands of Green Kiosks to reduce the need for paper.ICICI Bank is helping funding research in clean technology using TFD while Canara Bank has funded almost 50,000 units of Solar Lighting .

Most of Green Banking is in providing loan at concessional interest rates to customers though its a difficult job given the conservative nature of banking and the newness of the Green Industry.Finance Companies in India have been facing a tough problem in lending to Solar Energy projects in India under the JNNSM.Their reluctance is due to the bankrupt condition of the state distribution electricity companies and the inexperience of solar power developers in India.However the Banks have in spite of all this introduced debt products with SBI extending a 15 year tenure project financing loan for a solar power project.Note Green Banking is essential if India wants to meet its target of 15% of Energy coming from Renewable Energy by 2020 from around 5% at present.

Banking on green projects

Recently, Naina Lal Kidwai, group general manager and country head, HSBC India, had sought regulations for banks on funding projects that may not be environmentally sustainable. Kidwai had expressed the need for certain uniform standards or guidelines to be adopted by the banks for funding projects that are not environmentally friendly.When asked if there are projects that the bank does not finance because of environmental concerns, she says, “Since there are no fixed standards, if I don’t lend, somebody else will. But we definitely seek an environmental audit or the road map of the company on clean technologies before we lend. In case the company does not have a clear strategy, we will not be comfortable lending.”

However, the scenario seems to be changing swiftly since the Indian economy has seen the emergence of green banking.Thanks to the increased awareness about global warming, banks are now putting their acts together, taking into consideration the environmental concerns more seriously than before.

Hydro Power is second largest source of electricity in the world accounting for roughly 20% of the worldwide demand of electricity with around 800 GW of capacity installed.There is considerable potential still left and developing countries  can be expected to install another 500 GW over the coming years.There is large unmet potential for generating cheap hydro power in Africa,India and China.Note most of the hydro power potential has already been tapped in developed countries of Europe and USA.Like other forms of  renewable energy,Hydro Power has its pros and cons.However if done correctly,the Advantages of Hydro Power easily overcome the Disadvantages making it  the best form of non-polluting power currently.

Note the Cost of Hydropower at $1-3/watt are in a wide band and if not planned and implemented correctly can lead to huge time and cost escalation.The Inga 3 Dam being proposed to be built on the Congo River in the DRC faces tough choices.The Hydro Dam on the Congo which will become the biggest hydro power project in Africa is wrestling over design issues.The major choice is between tunneling through rock structures or keeping open channels.Note the total cost of the 7 GW Power Plant will be around $14 billion making it the biggest investment in Congo and the 5th largest Hydro Power Plant in the world.Note Africa suffers from chronic power shortages which will become more acute with rising cots of fossil fuels and increasing per capita electricity demands.Making correct decisions on energy is vitally important for the development of the African continent.China is the country with the largest hydro power capacity at 200 GW which it wants to further increase to a massive 400 GW by 2020.

Note Grand Inga at 39000 MW is also being planned which would make it the world’s largest power plant in the world by far easily eclipsing the the famous Three Gorges Dam in China at 22.5 GW.Note like other large hydro power projects,Grand Inga has also faced criticism as small hydro power projects don’t have the disadvantages of the massive dams.The Grand Inga project will supply power to large swathes of southern Africa which will have their electricity grids connected .Most of the global financial institutions like World Bank,African Development Bank have interest in the project estmated to cost $80 billion.Note if there are massive cost and time overruns on Inga 3,then the implementation of Grand Inga which will be almost 6 times as large will become questionable.The success of Inga 3 is vitally important to the success of Grand Inga.Note there are already 2 hydro dams Inga 1 and Inga 2 generating 1800 MW.

Wind Power in India has been growing at a rapid pace making India the 5th largest global market for wind energy despite limited resources of wind energy.India Wind Power Plants are all set to grow with the entry of new wind power developers like Metal Traders  MMTC and  Ushudev International.Note MMTC is the state owned metal trading giant while Ushdev is the 3rd largest private sector trader in metals after Adani and Surana Groups.New Wind Farm Developers like Caparo,Greenko,Genting,Techno Electric have already put aggressive wind expansion plans in place.Now MMTC and Ushdev have joined the wind party as the economics of wind energy look enticing given the massive shortage of energy and the incentives given the government like GBI,Tax Breaks etc.

Ushdev Power Holdings Pvt the power subsidiary of the the metal trader is targeting 1000 MW of renewable  energy capacity by 2018 which would be a mix of solar,wind and hydro power.The company is looking to add 100 MW  of wind power capacity each year.Ushdev Power now owns 30.5 megawatts of wind farms in six different states

MMTC is running a  successful wind farms in India -  15 MW wind power plant at Gadag district,Karnataka and selling the electricity to HESCOM/KPTCL (Hubli Electricity Supply Company, a Karnataka Government enterprise).There are 25 Wind Turbines of 600 kw capacity running at the wind farm.MMTC has already recovered its investment which means a lucrative payback  period of only 4 years for its $15 million investment made in 2007.The company boosted by the success of the wind farm has planned to expand it to 50 MW and build wind farms in states like Gujarat and Maharashtra which are also strongly pushing for wind energy.

MMTC chalks out expansion plan for wind energy

He said encouraged by this pilot project, the company has decided to scale up its existing production from 15 MW to another 50 MW in the next three years by adding another 40 machines each with an augmented capacity of 1,200 kV at a capital cost of Rs 250 crore.

He said the company has already initiated a feasibility study for the expansion plan, which would be ready by the end of this year. This would help the company to go ahead with the expansion plan in the current fiscal by identifying the location.He said besides Karnataka, the company is also planning to expand wind farm energy in other States, including Gujarat and Maharashtra.

Indian Lender Rural Electrification corporation (REC) is getting into investing directly into the renewable energy space in India.Note REC along with PFC,IDFC is one of the biggest lenders to the Indian power sector which is expected to treble in capacity over the next decade.These government institutions are instrumental in lending to the capital starved power sector.Both of these companies PFC and REC had come up with follow on offerings (FPOs) to augment their capital base.Now REC is deciding to diversify from  its power lending to directly investing in setting up hydro and biomass  power plants in the country.A subsidiary REC Power Distribution Company Ltd. will be used to make these green investments.

REC is looking to invest more than $600 million to set up 300-400 MW capacity in India and is already talking to the Himachal Pradesh government to set up plants there.REC has said that it is looking for power plants with a PLF of more than 50% which automatically rules out wind and solar energy.Its interesting that REC is concentrating on small hydro and biomass power capacity unlike other PSUs which are mainly concentrating on solar energy.India needs massive amounts of investment in renewable energy in order to meet its 15% Renewable Energy Obligation by 2020 from 5% at present.Its instrumental for the large government companies to invest heavily into clean sources of energy.Power Finance Corporation Green Energy has been set up by PFC to become one of the biggest lenders in Green Energy and now REC has also decided to directly invest in Green.More such initiatives will have to be taken to increase the cleantech energy capacity.

REC eyes renewable energy foray; plans investment

Looking to diversify into power generation, state-run Rural Electrification Corporation plans to set up renewable energy projects entailing an investment of about Rs 2,800 crore in the next five years.

“Within four to five years, we should have around 300 to 400 MW capacity in renewable energy. That’s our vision, so that they can contribute significantly to our balance sheet,” REC Chairman and Managing Director H D Khunteta told PTI.

“Investments would be around Rs 6-7 crore per MW,” he said.

REC, which offers finance for various power projects, plans to enter renewable energy sector through its subsidiary REC Power Distribution Company Ltd.

India has set a target of 20 GW of Nuclear Energy by 2020 from around 5 GW now and has already signed deals with major nuclear equpment suppliers like Areva,GE-Hitachi and Toshiba.However the Nuclear Disaster at Fukushima has changed things on the ground with protests growing by the day.Note only are the proposed nuclear reactors at Jaitapur facing massive protests,even the existing nuclear energy plants in India are seeing locals raising their voices.Recently many prominent citizens of India signed a protest letter against the upcoming Jaitapur plants.Note the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power has been debated on for a long time.The catastropic risk of a nuclear reactor meltdown is the biggest con of nuclear energy and has made it intolerable in a number of countries.After Japan has decided to kill nulcear power in the country,other progressive countries like Germany,Italy and Switzerland too are going to switch off nuclear reactors once the life of the existing plants are over.

Note the cost of nuclear power has grown at a distressing pace with massive time and cost overruns.The Areva Nulcear Plant is going to cost Rs 20 crore a MW which is much more than a Thermal Power plant and even costlier than Solar Power which has the highest capital requirement amongst major energy sources.Besides disposal of nuclear energy waste is a huge problem even for countries like USA and Japan which have huge nuclear power industries.For a country like India with poor safety record ,nuclear waste disposal would be a nightmare.India should learn from the example of Germany and Italy and stop going down the nuclear path and look for other green energy sources.Note different forms of Renewable Energy have their own pros and cons but Nuclear Energy Risks are too great to be ignored.

NIMBY Protests Growing

Rawatbhata Nuclear Power Plant in Rajasthan is situated near a major dam which makes it susceptible to major flooding.Besides the villages near the plant have reported higher incidences of abortion and cancer which is typical of radiation effect of human health.A new plant being proposed in Bhavnagar,Gujarat too is seeing protests being organized by villages near the plant.

Nuclear Plants face massive cost overruns

New Nuclear Power Plants face massive delays leading to much higher costs as rule and regulations become tougher.The Nuclear Power Already the nuclear renaissance which was supposed to be boosted by India and China is coming under attack.India’s nuclear power plant to be built at Jaitapur by Areva is seeing massive protests by local villagers as well as intellectuals alike.India has around 4.5 GW of Nuclear Power Plant Capacity which it proposes to increase by around 1-2 GW every year.This will hardly make a huge difference to India’s massive power needs which rerquires 10 GW of power every year.Nuclear Energy Disadvantages with the Tail Risk of a Meltdown are too huge to be ignored.China is the other country with massive nuclear power plans,however the government too has decided to be careful.China has more than doubled its solar power target to 50 GW by 2020 from 20 GW.

Fear of radiation grips locals residing near Rajasthan’s Rawatbhata nuclear power plant

The Rawatbhata nuclear power plant is built near the Maharana Pratap Dam, which the locals consider as vulnerable in wake of an occurrence of an earthquake or flood.

According to locals in case of an accident, the leaks from the reactor’s core can be extremely dangerous and threatening in the surrounding community.

“If the cooling system of the nuclear reactor ever fails, the toxic elements from the plant could mix themselves in the water from the lake. This would be hazardous for the population living here and in the nearby villages. The radiation will have prolonged affects in the 16-kilometer stretch of Rawatbhata and will continue to haunt the residents of nearby villages for a long time,” said Sunil Kumar, a local resident.

Meanwhile, local medical institutions say there has been a striking rise in the number of abortion and cancer cases in this region in the last few years.

Revolt brewing against nuclear plant in Bhavnagar – Hindu

The first bugle of revolt against the proposal to set up a 6000 MW capacity nuclear power plant at Jaspara-Mithi Virdi village in Bhavnagar district in the Saurashtra region of Gujarat was sounded on Friday.
The village panchayats of over 50 coastal villages in the district, which apprehend direct impact if the nuclear power plant is set up, took a “do or die” pledge at a public meeting at Mithi Virdi village not to allow the government to acquire their “fertile land” to set up the nuclear plant.

Ashok Parthasarathi: Renewable energy is the future, not nuclear – ET

It is well-known that because of the technology involved, nuclear power reactors are intrinsically highly capital-intensive. When one adds the protective technology and equipment, as well as the waste treatment technology and equipment described above, the capital costs go through the roof. Thus the capital cost of the ‘latest’ European Power Reactor (EPR) which the French firm Areva is to set up at Jaitapur in Maharashtra is around Rs 20 crore per Mw, compared to Rs 15 crore for solar power and Rs 6-7 crore per Mw for wind power. Such capital cost levels, in turn, take the cost of nuclear power to Rs 7-8 per KWh (or unit of power generated), making the reactors totally uneconomic.

Then there is the problem of recurring slippages in the time scales of setting up nuclear power plants, particularly imported ones. For example, the two 1,000 Mw Russian reactors coming up at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu are already four years behind schedule, provided they are actually commissioned in 2011 and 2012, as the Nuclear Power Corporation claims they will be. The four Areva 1,650 Mw EPRs — one each in France and Finland, and two in China — are also four years behind schedule, with no firm commissioning dates indicated by Areva as of now.